Before the regular season ends, there are a couple of rule changes that are being considered for next season that were emailed to me. Vote on each one and feel free to display an idea if you have one.
FIRST VOTE:
Changing the Multi Game Rule for an MLS position player - The current rule is to use the players average over the course of a week and then round his average up. The new idea/rule would change this to counting all his scores for the week. Vote "Yes" if you want to have an MLS player who plays 2 games in a week have all his scores count. Vote "No" if you want to keep te rule in place where the players average is counted. THIS IS ONLY FOR POSITION PLAYERS, KEEPER IS THIRD VOTE.
SECOND VOTE:
Changing the Bidding War voting system - The current rule allows you to vote as many times as you want until the bidding war time limit expires. The new idea/rule would changes this to allowing a BSL owner to have 1 bid only and force this BSL owner to gamble on who he is going to offer in the bidding war. Vote "Yes" if you want to have only 1 blind offer in a bidding war. Vote "No" if you want to keep it the way it is and have multiple chances to up the value of your bid for the new transfer player.
THIRD VOTE:
Changing the Goal Keeper Multi Game Rule - The current rule counts the average of a Keeper's clean sheet's and saves for a week if he plays 2 MLS games. The new rule would give a point for a clean sheet regardless of average or a saves point regardless of average. BE AWARE, This means a Keeper could have 4 points, 2 clean sheets and 2 saves points in a week he plays 2 games if this rule is approved. Vote "yes" if you want this change. Vote "no" if you want to stay with current Keeper rule of his averages.
Voting ends Friday 5pm (Pacific) If a majority votes yes out the the total of BSL club votes placed, the change will be done.
As usual I will not vote until the last day as to not sway opinions. Although I do have some strong opinions about these.
ReplyDelete1ST VOTE = NO
ReplyDelete2nd VOTE = YES
3rd VOTE = NO
1st Vote - No
ReplyDelete3rd Vote - No
2nd Vote - I'm leaning towards yes but I want to know how would the blind bid work? We would just send our bid to the commish?
The blind bid was my wording. You still post on the web site. But you have one offer only. So you have to decide to offer someone valuable or not right away. The risk is you might give away more than you really needed too.
ReplyDeleteVote 1 = YES
ReplyDeleteScores should count, period. These schedules are spread amongst the teams throughout the season. It happens. No different than schedule weeks were people miss the BSL week. Quirks happen. Why penalize teams for it ?
Vote 2 - NO.
Unless the bidding actually is blind. Otherwise it's just like negotiating with a FA. Blind bidding is the only way I'd go for a 1 bid process.
Vote 3 - YES. Again, scores should count, period. Same reasoning for the players.
I also propose we have 1 injured slot for the likes of Ferreira,Morales, and Zakuani. Teams shouldn't be penalized for that kind of thing.
I propose that Red Carded players that have scored, should have those scores count as well. Sure, they're done and the opponent's 1st sub comes on automatically. However, any scores they have shouldn't be erased. They aren't in real life, so why here ?
I'm okay with an injury slot, but I think there needs to be some rules so it doesn't get abused. Something like the player as to be on the MLS injury report and/or the player put in the injury spot as to stay there for so many games.
ReplyDelete1 - NO
ReplyDelete2 - YES
3 - NO
1 - NO
ReplyDelete2 - NO
3 - NO
No to all 3. Thanks
ReplyDeletei vote no all three.
ReplyDeletebut i have an alternate proposal on the multiple games in a week dilemma, a bit of a compromise if you will.
have the player's best game count (ex. if a player scores 3 goals in one game and has one assist in the other, you receive three points for the goals and the assist is ignored). Many weeks this will be the same as averaging out the scores, but sometimes you will receive the benefit of a standout performance.
No to all, but I like Pennsylvania's suggestion
ReplyDelete